Editorial independence and primary-source discipline

Research & Editorial Standards

CenterWorth's value depends entirely on the quality and accuracy of its data. These standards govern how we select sources, verify information, calculate outputs, handle corrections, and communicate limitations.

Regulatory Data Standards

Primary sources only

CenterWorth compiles staff-to-child ratios, group size limits, space requirements, and conditional staffing rules exclusively from official, primary-source government documents — state administrative codes, state statutes, licensing agency regulations, and agency-published rule documents. We never use secondary aggregators, advocacy organization publications, informal web summaries, or user-contributed data as a regulatory source.

Excluded sources

The following categories are explicitly excluded from CenterWorth's regulatory data pipeline:

  • ACF/ChildCare.gov agency profiles — these are self-reported by states and not independently verified
  • Advocacy organization publications (even well-regarded ones)
  • News articles or media summaries of regulatory changes
  • Wikipedia or crowd-sourced resources
  • Secondary data aggregators that do not link to primary code text
  • Data from organizations with a financial or advocacy interest in how the rules are described

Verification pipeline

Each state regulatory record passes through a structured verification process before publication:

  1. Source identification: Locate the current administrative code or statute governing licensed childcare centers for the specific state and facility type (center license, not family home).
  2. Primary rule extraction: Extract ratio, group size, space, and conditional staffing rules directly from the rule text, citing the specific section and subsection.
  3. Cross-reference: Confirm extracted values against any agency-published summary documents or guidance, noting discrepancies.
  4. Effective date and version: Document the effective date of the rule version reviewed and flag any pending amendments where known.
  5. Confidence scoring: Assign a verification status reflecting the scope and completeness of the review.
  6. Record locking: Verified records are locked in CenterWorth's database and cannot be overwritten without a documented review event.

Verification status labels

Verified — full regulatory review: The primary administrative code or statute was reviewed in full. Ratios, group sizes, conditional rules, space requirements, and citations were confirmed against the rule text. The record is locked and will not be updated without a documented re-review.
Reviewed — partial: The primary source was reviewed but one or more fields could not be extracted (e.g., a ratio table was present in an appendix that was not machine-readable). The record notes which fields were not confirmed.
Not yet verified: A record exists for this state and facility type but has not passed full review. This status is explicitly communicated to users and such data is not published as authoritative.

What we do not claim

  • We do not claim that our data is current as of today's date — it reflects a specific review date shown on each record.
  • We do not claim to cover every rule that may apply to your facility — conditional rules, program-specific overlays, and local amendments may apply beyond what is shown.
  • We do not claim that our summaries constitute legal advice or replace consultation with your state licensing agency or a licensed attorney.
  • We do not claim that a rule we've verified has not since been amended — regulations change without notice.

Financial and Economic Data Standards

Census ACS data

Population, household income, and childcare-age population data comes directly from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) via the Census Bureau API. CenterWorth uses 5-year ACS estimates at the census tract level for paid reports, which provides the highest geographic resolution available. ACS estimates are published annually; our data reflects the most recent available vintage at the time a report is generated. Margin of error exists for all ACS estimates, particularly for smaller geographies — we acknowledge this uncertainty rather than presenting point estimates as precise counts.

BLS OEWS wage data

Wage benchmarks for childcare workers, preschool teachers, and center directors come from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) survey. BLS OEWS is the only nationally representative, government-collected wage survey covering these occupations at the state level. Data is published annually (typically in May) and reflects the prior year. CenterWorth uses the most current BLS OEWS vintage at the time of API query. BLS wage data lags current market conditions by 12–18 months and we note this on every benchmark that relies on it.

Benchmark calculations

CenterWorth's financial benchmarks — rent per square foot, operating cost percentages, and similar derived metrics — are computed from observed market data, not from industry surveys or advocacy publications. Specific methodology:

  • Payroll benchmarks are anchored to BLS OEWS state-level median wages for SOC 39-9011 (Childcare Workers), 25-2011 (Preschool Teachers), and related occupations.
  • Operating cost percentages are derived from our model of typical center expense structures applied to BLS wage data and self-reported inputs — not from survey data.
  • Rent benchmarks use regional commercial real estate market data and are directionally accurate but should always be replaced with actual market quotes for any specific location.

Corrections and Updates

How corrections happen

When CenterWorth identifies an error in its regulatory data — through internal QA, a reader report, or a detected change in the source document — the correction follows a documented process: the original record is preserved in our version history, the corrected values are imported with a new timestamp and change description, and the updated data is re-verified before publication. We do not silently overwrite records.

Reporting an error

If you believe a ratio, citation, or other regulatory value on CenterWorth is incorrect, please contact us with the specific field and your primary source citation. The most useful reports include a direct link to the applicable section of the state administrative code or statute. We review every substantive correction report and respond within 5 business days.

Regulatory change monitoring

CenterWorth monitors registered source URLs for content changes. When a change is detected, the affected record is flagged for manual review before any values are updated. We do not automatically accept source changes as authoritative — a changed document is a trigger for human review, not an automatic data update. This prevents both missed updates and premature overwrites when source URLs change without a regulatory change occurring.

Data freshness and staleness

Every regulatory record in CenterWorth carries a "data as of" date reflecting when the primary source was last reviewed. This date is displayed prominently on state ratio pages and in every report that uses regulatory data. CenterWorth does not represent its regulatory data as current — it represents it as accurate as of the review date. The gap between the review date and today should inform how much additional verification the user performs before relying on the data.

Benchmark Limitations

Financial projections are estimates, not guarantees

CenterWorth's profitability model, break-even analysis, and feasibility grades are analytical tools for decision support. Actual outcomes depend on enrollment ramp rate, staff turnover, local competition, interest rates, lease terms, and dozens of other variables the model cannot predict. No financial projection from CenterWorth should be used as a substitute for a full financial audit, a certified public accountant's review, or an investor's independent due diligence.

Wage and rent benchmarks lag current market conditions

BLS OEWS wage data reflects the prior year and is typically 12–18 months behind current market conditions. Commercial rent benchmarks are directional. Always replace CenterWorth's regional benchmarks with current market quotes before making a lease commitment or salary offer.

Regulatory data reflects a specific review date

Staff-to-child ratios and licensing rules can and do change. CenterWorth's data reflects what the rule said on the date it was reviewed. It may not reflect amendments, emergency rules, or guidance issued since that date. Always verify current requirements with your state licensing agency before making any compliance decision.

Market comparisons are illustrative, not precise

CenterWorth's feasibility grading and market positioning analysis are based on modeled benchmarks, not a comprehensive survey of competitor centers in your specific market. A score that looks favorable against a statewide benchmark may not reflect local competitive conditions.

CenterWorth is not a legal, accounting, or consulting firm

Nothing on CenterWorth constitutes legal advice, accounting advice, or professional consulting services. Use of CenterWorth's tools and data is subject to our Terms of Service and Disclaimer.

What CenterWorth Does Not Publish

Fabricated testimonials, reviews, or ratings
Made-up benchmarks or statistics not traceable to a primary source
Predictions or forecasts presented as facts
Regulatory claims that aren't anchored to a specific primary citation
Market share or industry size claims from advocacy publications or press releases
Personal information from our users beyond what they explicitly provide
Claims about regulatory compliance, licensing outcomes, or legal interpretations

Related resources